I was disappointed

Jul 01, 2009,20:57 PM
 

"price considerations be made secondary to the pure appreciation of watches."

Yes, I just have not reached that level of sophistication yet smile 

It is the other "PuristS" goal, to be inclusive and not exclusive, which drove my commentary.

I think the XXXL is well executed and would be appreciated by many PuristS (not in words alone but actual ownership) if they followed the PuristSPro ABR watch strategy.  Keep it reasonable, fuel the passion, give everyone and anyone the opportunity to share in the experience.  As the mod, I feel this is very important.

But perhaps this is not a possibility in the luxury market where exclusivity is used as a main selling point :-(

 

Cheers, Mike

This message has been edited by mkt33 on 2009-07-01 21:02:37

  login to reply

Comments: view entire thread

 

An In-Depth Review of the Montblanc Sport XXXL Tantalum Chronograph

 
 By: AnthonyTsai : June 29th, 2009-19:34
An In-Depth Review of the Montblanc Sport XXXL Tantalum Chronograph – "Tantalizing Tantalum" By Dr. Thomas Mao & Anthony Tsai © June 2009 Tantalum is Periodic Table Element #73, between hafnium and tungsten, and falls into the transition metals group. Fre...  

well, not really pleasing ...

 
 By: time2tic : June 30th, 2009-05:58
thanks for your in depth presentation of a model that IMHO does not deserve the spotlight. your conclusions are going in my direction too. the tantalum unpractical metal ( makes a very heavy case that would only be balanced by an even heavier metal strap)...  

the rieussec is the obvious choice

 
 By: mkt33 : June 30th, 2009-08:07
I couldn't agree more! but the entry point is still quite high for the majority of watch enthusiasts. Your picture of the original Montblanc Tantalum piece highlights the same issues as the current XXXL chronograph. The XXXL does have the interesting supe... 

Thanks for the review! [nt]

 
 By: DRMW : June 30th, 2009-10:32
No message body

Plated, really?

 
 By: aaronm : June 30th, 2009-08:26
this was the line that killed me "All the hands and chronograph rehaut rings are plated in 18kt red gold" A

That's just silly

 
 By: aaronm : July 1st, 2009-10:29

A thorough and revealing, educational review.

 
 By: pingtsai : June 30th, 2009-21:10
Thank you for another well put together review and for Michael Ting's closing comments which I suspect represent a lot of Purist's sentiments toward this watch. Hopefully, Montblanc will be smart enough to put them into consideration going forward. Guess ... 

Thanks for the review AT

 
 By: SJX : July 1st, 2009-05:18
I'm not sure I like the aesthetics of this particular watch; I've never seen it in person. But I like tantalum very much, the weight and colour are truly unique. - SJX

Montblanc has much better to show, IMO

 
 By: amanico : July 1st, 2009-05:56
Than this cheap looking Chrono. I say it like a friend, to be clear. I don't get it. While Montblanc is able to launch ( at a higher price, I admit ) some superb products, why breaking this dynamic with such a watch. The dial is so so, the case is not rea... 

Hi Nicolas, You are right enthusiasts should focus on the Rieussec and the Villeret 1858

 
 By: mkt33 : July 1st, 2009-08:52
at the top end. Best, Mike fixed typo This message has been edited by AnthonyTsai on 2009-07-01 10:27:32

Star 4810

 
 By: autopolit : July 6th, 2009-08:07
I agree...what do you think of the Star 4810 collection?

An alternate merely PuristS view......

 
 By: MTF : July 1st, 2009-16:42
Forumners, Somewhere in the rubric of our Constitution, we ask that price considerations be made secondary to the pure appreciation of watches. Reading through the thread and just looking at the photos, I was struck by the dichotomy between the Opinion ab... 

I was disappointed

 
 By: mkt33 : July 1st, 2009-20:57
"price considerations be made secondary to the pure appreciation of watches." Yes, I just have not reached that level of sophistication yet It is the other "Purist S " goal, to be inclusive and not exclusive, which drove my commentary. I think the XXXL is... 

Thanks AT and Thomas for the review, and Mike for the follow-up

 
 By: Z3 : July 1st, 2009-23:17
Interesting watch, and the combination of rose gold and tantalum is aesthetically pleasant. But at $23,500...? We might expect to see large discount on the secondary market - this is not a good way to build credibility in retail prices... Jon

Not my taste (regardless of price), but...

 
 By: dxboon : July 2nd, 2009-06:50
...I applaud the use of tantalum, a metal I love, and the rose gold/tantalum pairing, which is very attractive. Thanks all for the excellent write-up and comments. Cheers, Daos

Tantalum is Tantalizing

 
 By: daringdave : July 2nd, 2009-16:47
What an aesthetically pleasing look; I was immediately attracted to the metal colors and found it a very handsome combination. I appreciate your critique and quite agree that the band must be more supple. Interesting, I just took delivery of a Gerald Gent... 

Nice watch!

 
 By: patrick_y : July 2nd, 2009-23:45
Seems like a great watch that really needs a better strap to make it sit comfortably/securely on the wrist. I applaud Montblanc for making a watch from Tantalum and I'm intrigued about the history of the king ordering a tantalum watch for hunting use. Gre... 

First of all....

 
 By: MiniCooper : July 6th, 2009-18:22
thanks for the review..... I would like to add to the consensus that this watch leaves some things to be desired Cheers